When in Chile is thought important in a presidential candidate's personal characteristics (a): the academic, speech, thinking skills, experience and political leadership. But if there is anything that gives consistency to an application (regardless of polls or votes) are the guarantees of governance that this or that candidate can offer the country. This is a subjective element of assessing and passing through people's perception of the degree candidate's ability to create forums for dialogue, a spirit of inclusion of social actors, the ability to build upon the political and ultimately by the perception the willingness of the candidate of wanting to govern with all and for all.
In this it is clear that the individual, team movements and political parties that accompany the candidate plays a role, I mean with those who govern, who are in Congress that will support the legislative initiatives of the President, who will be ministers of State, what are the certainties of the implementation of new policies, which the continuity of existing ones, which are the guarantees for public and private sector that supports the changes will be made that claim.
Governance as an ongoing exercise of dialogue, understanding, building agreements and addressing the forces and political interests to the common good, requires in principle the party support teams and political grounds. Piñera and Frei can be criticized on many sides, but if some have their applications is that these issues are relatively clear: both are leaders in their respective coalitions, have programmatic support equipment and a considerable number of parliamentarians in the exercise, at the same time are craftsmen, each of the templates parliamentary legislative backing of any government. On the characteristics of governance, Eduardo Frei has shown today have much more charisma than in its previous application and caution, Piñera in turn, is a leader and a symbol for many Chileans of entrepreneurship and business success. On the other hand is known in advance what the sight of them, or at least of political parties and programmatic teams that support them, facts which in sum provide the perception of governance of the candidate.
But what happens to Marco Enríquez-Ominami? So far it is an emerging but lonely, which has been based on the critical drive to a traditional way of doing politics, facing anyone who opposes his candidacy in particular those of his own political party (PS) and Piñera reproached candidates and Frei as representing the wear of the political leaders. Undoubtedly, the discourse on policy not to privatize the public has caught on, particularly from a viewpoint of the excluded. But the question is what level of governance offers Marco Enríquez-Ominami and the support we can achieve if you maintain an attitude of a victim of the political system and ongoing criticism of his peers?
The Chilean we like to respect us, especially when it comes to our reputation as a country and our visible face of president (a). In this regard the diagnosis is absolutely clear, we like the reliability, credibility and governance, elements that are valued and that we transform the election, polls on trends in a matter of pride to every citizen.
We believe that Marco Enríquez-Ominami has major strengths as a candidate especially for the courage and the impetus that unable to install the progressive topics, but also has great challenges, which go through the standard not only of discontent but presented as a letter warranties of governance.
Regard must change its attitude to a higher wisdom and humility, showing an overview, providing political certainties, build trust in people, especially political actors to express and understand the positions does not mean entering the media near misses first to criticize his candidacy, all assets that are measured in time and do not necessarily come with a reply form or unruly. The reflection that we have is that so far the governance that can provide the emerging presidential candidate is a pending matter that should work on pain of falling into conflict with the functions of the political claim to which they aspire, as president of the nation.
this esn a seed consertacion